Conversion: To establish a claim for conversion (unlawful control over your personal property), you must prove that: (1) you owned, possessed or had a right to possess the item of personal property (e.g., funds, securities, tangible assets), (2) the defendant intentionally and substantially interfered with your property by one or more of the following – taking possession of it, preventing you from having access to it, destroying it, or refusing to return it after you demanded its return, (3) you did not consent, (4) you were harmed, and (5) the defendant’s conduct was a substantial factor in causing your harm. CACI 2100.
Privacy Claims: A person’s right to privacy can be violated in more than one way. Below are some of the possible ways:
Intrusion Into Private Affairs: To establish this claim, you must prove that (1) you had a reasonable expectation of privacy in a particular place or other circumstance, (2) the defendant intentionally intruded in that place or circumstance, (3) the defendant’s intrusion would be highly offensive to a reasonable person, (4) you were harmed, and (5) the defendant’s conduct was a substantial factor in causing your harm. CACI 1800.
- “Reasonable expectation of privacy”: In deciding whether you had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the place or circumstance involved, a jury will consider, among other things: (a) the identify of the defendant; (b) the extent to which other persons had access to that place or circumstance and could see or hear you; and (c) the means by which the intrusion occurred. CACI 1800.
- “Highly offensive”: In deciding whether an intrusion is highly offensive to a reasonable person, a jury will consider, among other things, (a) the extent of the intrusion, (b) the defendant’s motives and goals, and (c) the setting in which the intrusion occurred. CACI 1800.
Public Disclosure of Private Facts: To establish this claim, you must prove that (1) the defendant publicized private information about you, (2) a reasonable person in your position would consider the publicity highly offensive, (3) the defendant knew, or acted with a reckless disregard of the fact, that a reasonable person in your position would consider the publicity highly offensive, (4) the private information was not of legitimate public concern, or had no substantial connection to a matter of legitimate public concern, (5) you were harmed, and (6) defendant’s conduct was a substantial factor in causing your harm. CACI 1801.
- “Public disclosure”: In deciding whether defendant publicized the information, a jury will determine whether it was made public either by communicating it to the public at large or to so many people that the information was substantially certain to become public knowledge. CACI 1801.
- “Legitimate public concern: A jury will consider, among other things, (a) the social value of the information, (b) the extent of the intrusion into your privacy, and (c) whether you consented to the publicity explicitly or by voluntarily seeking public attention or a public office. CACI 1801.
False Light: To establish this claim for invasion of privacy where someone creates a false impression about you, you must prove that (1) the defendant publicized information or material that showed you in a false light, (2) the false light created by the publication would be highly offensive to a reasonable person in your position, (3) there is clear and convincing evidence that the defendant knew the publication would create a false impression about you, or acted with reckless disregard for the truth – or the defendant was negligent in determining the truth of the information or whether a false impression would be created by its publication, (4) you were harmed (e.g., harm to your property, business, profession, including money spent as a result of the statement/s), and (5) defendant’s conduct was a substantial factor in causing your harm. CACI 1802.
(Commercial) Appropriation of Name or Likeness: To establish this claim, you must prove that (1) the defendant used your name, likeness or identity without your permission, (2) defendant gained a commercial benefit or some other advantage by using your name, likeness or identify, (3) you were harmed, (4) the defendant’s conduct was a substantial factor in causing your harm, and (5) your privacy interests outweigh the public interest served by defendant’s use of your name, likeness or identity (considering where the information was used, the extent of the use, the public interest served, and the seriousness of the interference with your privacy). CACI 1803. A 1st Amendment defense exists if (1) the work adds something new to your likeness, giving it a new expression, meaning or message, or (2) the value of the work does not result primarily from your fame. CACI 1805.
(Commercial) Use of Name, Likeness, etc. in Advertisement: To establish this claim, you must prove that (1) the defendant knowingly used your name, voice, signature, photograph or likeness on merchandise or to advertise or sell something, (2) the use did not occur in connection with a news, public affairs or sports broadcast or account, or with a political campaign, (3) the defendant did not have your consent, (4) the defendant’s use of your name, voice, signature, photograph or likeness was directly connected to defendant’s commercial purpose, (5) you were harmed, and (6) defendant’s conduct was a substantial factor in causing your harm. CACI 1804A. The same 1st Amendment defense noted above can apply.
Justification for Privacy Violation: A defendant’s conduct will be justified if he/she/it proves that the circumstances justified the invasion of privacy because doing so substantially furthered some legitimate or compelling competing interest. If the defendant proves that his/her/its conduct was justified, then you must prove that there was a practical, effective and less invasive method of achieving the defendant’s purpose. CACI 1807.
Stalking: Another privacy claim can be brought, based on stalking, if you can prove that (1) the defendant engaged in a pattern of conduct with the intent to follow, alarm or harass you, supported by evidence in addition to your testimony, (2) as a result of this conduct, you reasonably feared for your own safety or the safety of an immediate family member, (3) (a) as part of the pattern of conduct, the defendant made a believable threat with the intent to place you in reasonable fear for your safety or the safety of an immediate family member, (b) you clearly demanded at least once that the defendant stop, and (c) the defendant persisted in his or her pattern of conduct – or the defendant violated a restraining order prohibiting the pattern of conduct, (4) you were harmed, and (5) the defendant’s conduct was a substantial factor in causing your harm. CACI 1808.
- A “pattern of conduct” means a series of words or actions over a period of time, however short, that reflects an ongoing purpose. CACI 1808.
- “Harass” means a knowing and willful course of conduct directed at you that seriously alarms, annoys, torments or terrorizes you, and which serves no legitimate purpose. The course of conduct must be such as would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress, and must actually cause substantial emotional distress to you. CACI 1808.